Game of Drones

The Debate Over Private Drone Use

From apps such as Yelp that help us find the best Thai restaurants within a five-block radius to sites like Google Maps that aid us in determining the fastest route to a job interview, we use satellite images daily. The convenience and efficiency of these apps and programs outweigh privacy concerns, but what about the idea of governmental and personal surveillance through the use of unregulated video shadowing?
Imagine the prospect of countless drones flying through the open sky, able to take HD video, even capable of tracking people based on the colors they wear. This seemingly futuristic dystopian vision is sparking debate across the American public: should private drone use be legal, and if so, what regulations should be present?

Personal drones – or unmanned aerial vehicles (AAVs) – are available anywhere from Amazon.com to local malls. Anyone can purchase an AAV, and the more basic models average around $300. The Parrot AR.Drone 2.0, available on Amazon, can be controlled by iPhone, iPad, and Android devices. A personal drone can be an innocently fun Christmas gift for kids, but can also be a potentially dangerous tool for stalkers and criminals. Videos collected by AAVs can be easily uploaded onto smartphones and computers, but there is no legal regulation regarding the content of the videos. Operators of personal drones may unintentionally record criminal behavior or infringe on strangers’ privacy. Of course, this raises some questions: what are the guidelines for personal privacy and is accidental invasion of privacy an enforceable offense?

Overhead territory is considered public space, so some make the argument that the physical presence of personal drones in the air is an activity that is harmless and provides no cause for legal redress. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has enforced some boundaries for private drones. AAVs, which follow the same jurisdiction as model planes, must not fly above 400 feet, must be visible from the ground, and must steer clear of airports. Even with these restrictions, the FAA does not address the privacy concerns of the public sector. For the most part, the regulations set forth by the FAA are set to ensure air safety for other aircraft, but the FAA does forbid commercial use of private drones as it is illegal for businesses to use video and photo captured by AAVs for their own benefit. However, there is no legal penalty for personal drone hobbyist use and enforcement in this sector is not within the power of the FAA.

Discussions over law enforcement of private drone use currently reside at the state level and many states are taking measures to create private drone laws. In Texas, Republican Representative Lance Gooden is pushing legislation that would effectively prohibit personal, state, and federal drone use. The bill would include a couple of exceptions, including the allowance of drones within a twenty-five mile radius of the Rio Grande for illegal immigrant and drug intervention purposes. Gooden’s hope is that this legislation will avert drones from the apprehension of “indiscriminate surveillance.” Gooden’s proposed bill exposes the problematic contentiousness surrounding drone law enforcement. Debates over federal versus state legislation, the depth of privacy concerns, the interest of personal and public safety, and the inhibition of the drone market all intersect to present greatly divided and convoluted motivations for law enforcement.

The police sector presents a sharply split dispute regarding the pros and cons of drone use. Police drone use may be useful in searching for missing persons, surveying hostage situations, and tracking suspected criminals. While the use of drones by the police has its benefits, it also raises privacy concerns, especially with respect to the Fourth Amendment. In Charlottesville, Virginia, for example, any evidence obtained by drones cannot be used in court. The city permits the police use of drones only for efforts such as search and rescue. Charlottesville presents an instance of municipal drone enforcement and the results of its legislation may provide precedence for statewide or federal law regarding drones. In Seattle, by comparison, Mayor Michael McGinn banned the use of private drones by the Seattle Police Department after public protest.

The cases in Charlottesville and Seattle illustrate public concern over unwarranted surveillance, and uncover controversies over the legislative level – municipal, state, or federal – of drone law enforcement. The debates expose not only the controversial purposes and motivations for AAV use, but also consider restrictions over who is able to use drones. Many Americans have raised concerns about neighbors or strangers using drones to spy or peep and about public agencies utilizing drones to conduct surveillance. The Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) contests these concerns in respect to the Virginia Legislation. The AUVSI argues that public agency drone prohibition would obstruct public safety, and impede Virginia’s potential economic growth as more jobs become available within the drone and public surveillance markets.

Debate over public and private drone use presents an especially tricky predicament over the relationship between technology and legal regulation. The drone debate will continue to raise concerns in legislation, especially in subtle discrepancies between personal and public use. This controversy exposes pressing issues for present and future legal debate: can the law keep up with technology, and how does technology compromise private and public interests?

For now, it is best to choose not to embrace the paranoia – I am not worried about constantly looking overhead to see if I am being followed by a flying camera. The real concern lies in the future legislative compromise between private and public drone interests, and what this decision will illustrate about potentially increased government regulation.

 

Tucker Westbrook is a FCRH 2015 Political Science major and he may be contacted at twestbrook@fordham.edu.

297 thoughts on “Game of Drones”

  1. Pingback: Google
  2. Pingback: FCMB
  3. Pingback: ssexy
  4. Pingback: suction cup dong
  5. Pingback: Google
  6. Pingback: Melanie Bowen
  7. Pingback: timberland
  8. Pingback: balenciaga
  9. Pingback: nike foamposite
  10. Pingback: yeezy boost
  11. Pingback: buy generic cialis
  12. Pingback: cheap jordans
  13. Pingback: supreme hoodie
  14. Pingback: off white
  15. Pingback: jimmy choo
  16. Pingback: polo ralph lauren
  17. Pingback: supreme new york
  18. Pingback: yeezy boost 350 v2
  19. Pingback: nike air max 90
  20. Pingback: natural cialis
  21. Pingback: viagra pill
  22. Pingback: viagra in action
  23. Pingback: cialis vs levitra
  24. Pingback: viagra cost
  25. Pingback: viagra alternative
  26. Pingback: real viagra
  27. Pingback: online viagra
  28. Pingback: cost of viagra
  29. Pingback: canadian viagra
  30. Pingback: sildenafil dosage
  31. Pingback: cialis prices 5mg
  32. Pingback: cialis prices 10mg
  33. Pingback: cialis prices 20mg
  34. Pingback: viagra sex
  35. Pingback: viagra for sale
  36. Pingback: viagra for women
  37. Pingback: sophia viagra
  38. Pingback: dutch women viagra
  39. Pingback: generic levitra
  40. Pingback: discount cialis
  41. Pingback: cialis on line
  42. Pingback: cialis black
  43. Pingback: cost of cialis
  44. Pingback: cialis medication
  45. Pingback: cialis and alcohol
  46. Pingback: otc cialis
  47. Pingback: online cialis
  48. Pingback: cialis wikipedia
  49. Pingback: cialis walmart
  50. Pingback: cialis from canada
  51. Pingback: cialis 5mg coupon
  52. Pingback: cialis 5mg
  53. Pingback: cialis soft
  54. Pingback: cialis for women
  55. Pingback: cialis for sale
  56. Pingback: liquid cialis
  57. Pingback: cialis saving card
  58. Pingback: cialis samples
  59. Pingback: generic for cialis
  60. Pingback: cialis reviews
  61. Pingback: cialis daily
  62. Pingback: cialis price
  63. Pingback: canadian cialis
  64. Pingback: cialis copay card
  65. Pingback: free cialis coupon
  66. Pingback: 5mg cialis
  67. Pingback: free cialis
  68. Pingback: what is levitra
  69. Pingback: vardenafil generic
  70. Pingback: levitra vs cialis
  71. Pingback: levitra recviews
  72. Pingback: levitra online
  73. Pingback: what is levaquin
  74. Pingback: augmentin uses
  75. Pingback: levaquin uses
  76. Pingback: augmentin for uti
  77. Pingback: levitra cost
  78. Pingback: sildenafil coupons
  79. Pingback: augmentin dose
  80. Pingback: levaquin for uti
  81. Pingback: augmentin dosage
  82. Pingback: buy levitra online
  83. Pingback: cheap levitra
  84. Pingback: levaquin 750 mg
  85. Pingback: augmentin 875 mg
  86. Pingback: buy levitra
  87. Pingback: levaquin 500 mg
  88. Pingback: augmentin 875
  89. Pingback: levaquin
  90. Pingback: augmentin
  91. Pingback: duloxetine 60 mg
  92. Pingback: duloxetine hcl
  93. Pingback: vardenafil 20mg
  94. Pingback: duloxetine 20 mg
  95. Pingback: vardenafil 20 mg
  96. Pingback: vardenafil
  97. Pingback: levitra vs viagra
  98. Pingback: cymbalta reviews
  99. Pingback: levitra dosage
  100. Pingback: levitra coupon
  101. Pingback: cymbalta generic
  102. Pingback: levitra 20 mg
  103. Pingback: cymbalta for pain
  104. Pingback: atorvastatin 10mg
  105. Pingback: cymbalta dosage
  106. Pingback: atorvastatin 10 mg
  107. Pingback: levitra generic
  108. Pingback: cymbalta
  109. Pingback: atorvastatin
  110. Pingback: cialis free trial
  111. Pingback: cialis cooupons
  112. Pingback: cialis coupons
  113. Pingback: cialis cost
  114. Pingback: wiki escitalopram
  115. Pingback: tadalafila
  116. Pingback: cialis generika
  117. Pingback: cialis generico
  118. Pingback: cialis 20 mg
  119. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  120. Pingback: viagra for men
  121. Pingback: female viagra
  122. Pingback: viagra on line
  123. Pingback: natural viagra
  124. Pingback: bactrim antibiotic
  125. Pingback: cefdinir 300 mg
  126. Pingback: levitra
  127. Pingback: fluconazole 150 mg
  128. Pingback: cephalexin 500mg
  129. Pingback: biaxin antibiotic
  130. Pingback: prozac generic
  131. Pingback: fluoxetine 20 mg
  132. Pingback: sildenafil 100 mg
  133. Pingback: cialis tadalafil
  134. Pingback: sildenafil tablets
  135. Pingback: buy cialis online
  136. Pingback: sildenafil generic
  137. Pingback: cialis tablets
  138. Pingback: sildenafil 50 mg
  139. Pingback: sildenafil
  140. Pingback: lazo real madrid
  141. Pingback: buy sildenafil
  142. Pingback: prednisone 20 mg
  143. Pingback: buy cordarone
  144. Pingback: buy cialis
  145. Pingback: chloromycetin
  146. Pingback: buy biaxin online
  147. Pingback: buy chloromycetin
  148. Pingback: buy ceftin
  149. Pingback: buy biaxin
  150. Pingback: sildenafil 100
  151. Pingback: sildenafil 100mg
  152. Pingback: sildenafil 20 mg
  153. Pingback: viagra tablet
  154. Pingback: buy viagra online
  155. Pingback: cheap viagra
  156. Pingback: viagra coupons
  157. Pingback: viagra generic
  158. Pingback: viagra prices
  159. Pingback: viagra online
  160. Pingback: buy viagra
  161. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  162. Pingback: viagra pills
  163. Pingback: sildenafil citrate
  164. Pingback: viagra
  165. Pingback: cialis canada
  166. Pingback: cheap cialis
  167. Pingback: cialis pills
  168. Pingback: tadalafil generic
  169. Pingback: tadalafil 20 mg
  170. Pingback: cialis vs viagra
  171. Pingback: cialis coupon
  172. Pingback: cialis generic
  173. Pingback: cialis
  174. Pingback: viagra natural
  175. Pingback: viagra connect
  176. Pingback: generic viagra
  177. Pingback: viagra vs cialis
  178. Pingback: cialis prices
  179. Pingback: cialis dosage
  180. Pingback: tadalafil
  181. Pingback: cialis 20mg
  182. Pingback: fotbollströjor
  183. Pingback: viagra tablets
  184. Pingback: tadalafil 20mg
  185. Pingback: tadalafil 5mg
  186. Pingback: cialis online
  187. Pingback: generic cialis
  188. Pingback: maglie calcio

Leave a Reply