Obamacare is No Prescription for Income Inequality

When President Barack Obama passed the Affordable Care Act in 2010 without a single Republican vote, it seemed to many as though the Democratic Party was embarking on a tyranny-of-the-majority of sorts. With procedural maneuvers in place to annul Republican efforts at blocking its passage, the bill—termed ‘Obamacare’ by many on the right—became law, finally fulfilling the decades-old liberal dream of healthcare reform. Immediately after the bill was signed, David Leonhardt wrote in the New York Times as one of the first to declare that the new law was “the federal government’s biggest attack on economic inequality” in decades. Irrespective of a ‘we told you so’ attitude from the Republican Party, and the apparent newfound boldness displayed by many Democrats in addressing income inequality, perhaps it is time to separate truth from propaganda, and examine some of the mechanisms by which the ACA is able to influence wealth redistribution in the United States – and how successful they might be.

Firstly, given that the law is now four years old, it seems as though whatever objectives the ACA wished to accomplish regarding income inequality have not actually taken root yet. This is understandable, as many provisions of the law either just recently went into effect, or will go into effect in the coming years through 2020. Since the day the law was signed, however, many critical components of the ACA have already been implemented, namely, the banning on arbitrary insurance cancellations, the Consumer Assistance Program, and the new “Rate Review” procedures which are allegedly going to keep healthcare costs down. Yet, a recent study of income inequality in major U.S. cities notes that between 2007 and 2012, the gap between the richest and poorest residents is wider than ever before. It would be very, very difficult to argue that, between the law’s passing and the current time, any meaningful progress has been made in terms of income inequality in this country. That being said, it would be impossible and unwise for anyone, including the President, to make the case that the ACA has inaugurated some new period of economic fairness – at least not yet. Perhaps many of the mechanisms to counteract income inequality are contained in the “insurance marketplace,” or other components whose effects on personal finances cannot quite yet be measured.

A widely-discussed economic study from the Brookings Institution3 which addressed the ACA and income levels specifically reported just a few weeks ago that, according to their calculations, “Incomes in the bottom one-fifth of the distribution will increase almost 6%; those in the bottom one-tenth of the distribution will rise more than 7%. These estimated gains represent averages. Most people already have insurance coverage that will be left largely unaffected by reform. Those who gain subsidized insurance will see bigger percentage gains in their income.” The same study continues, “On net and under the broadest income measure, the gains and losses cause small proportional drops in income for Americans in the top three-quarters of the income distribution which offset the larger proportional gains obtained by Americans in the bottom quarter of the distribution.” In other words, wealthy individuals will lose very little because there are many of them, and the poor might collectively make out better due only to their proportion. If this study is, in fact, an accurate indicator of precisely how the ACA will affect the distribution of wealth across the country, what was often seen as President Obama’s subtle yet strong onslaught against income inequality might not be too grand after all.

This raises some questions: just how broad is this abstract national income inequality issue? Are the “very poor” (the bottom 10-20%) the only people that are hurt by the inequity trend? Is the concept of raising the incomes for the absolute bottom of the income bracket, while decreasing incomes by an essentially negligible 0.3-1.1% from wealthier Americans, actually enough? Better still, is it even an accomplishment? For today’s liberals, probably not.  In his inaugural address, Mayor Bill De Blasio stated that current levels of economic inequality threaten to “unravel” New York as he proposed profoundly higher taxes for the city’s wealthiest residents. Even President Obama himself noted in his most recent State of the Union address, “Today, after four years of economic growth [note: perhaps he should have said, “Four years after the passing of the healthcare reform bill”] corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better. Average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened.” As the White House, the City of New York, and states across the country under Democratic control seek to make income inequality their main focus of 2014, most liberals seem to think of the issue on much wider terms than this study’s bipolar approach dividing the country between the “extremely poor” and the other 75% of citizens who are more affluent – and rightly so, because as Mr. Obama points out, the vast majority of the country, including the middle class, is financially struggling. He noted, “The cold, hard fact is that even in the midst of recovery, too many Americans are working more than ever just to get by, let alone get ahead.” At its core, the ACA might not be able to deliver the massive income inequality results for which many on the American Left were ecstatic.

A recent article in the Associated Press addresses the specific ways that the law will theoretically function as a sort of Robin Hood progressive dream: “Obamacare takes a small slice out of the incomes of the top 80 percent…an increased payroll tax for the rich, a new tax on investment income and a reduction to enrollees in Medicare Advantage, a private insurance plan. The AP listed a jump in Medicare premiums for the wealthiest retirees as an additional reason.” Granted the blurriness and subjective nature behind describing the “American middle class,” one must ask: is the bottom 20% of Americans the only group who might be in extreme financial difficulty? Especially since the wealthy in the United States are colloquially described as the “upper one percent,” is it really sensible to address income inequality by designing a system that will only aid the most destitute social echelon, while lowering incomes for essentially everyone in the “middle class?”

It is entirely irrelevant whether this arrangement is seen as socialist government overreach, a perfectly acceptable way to support the economy, or something else entirely. Some things cannot be denied by anyone, on either side of the aisle: the implications of the ACA in regards to income inequality will definitely help some people – but too few. The law will certainly demand a larger income portion from high earners, but the net is cast way too widely, as it targets the “upper 80%.” That number should be much, much lower if the Affordable Care Act aims to make a substantial difference in terms of income inequality. Like a medication given for something other than its intended purpose, if Obamacare truly sought to be an “off-label” recipe for improving the economic prospects for struggling Americans by means of addressing income inequality, it might fail – miserably.

 

Related posts

42 Thoughts to “Obamacare is No Prescription for Income Inequality”

  1. web agency

    […]please visit the sites we stick to, including this one particular, as it represents our picks through the web[…]

  2. more

    […]here are some hyperlinks to websites that we link to for the reason that we feel they are worth visiting[…]

  3. t-shirts

    […]below you will obtain the link to some web pages that we feel you’ll want to visit[…]

  4. sabung ayam online

    […]check beneath, are some completely unrelated internet websites to ours, on the other hand, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

  5. Business Exchange

    […]very few web-sites that come about to be comprehensive below, from our point of view are undoubtedly very well really worth checking out[…]

  6. סקס

    […]we like to honor lots of other web web pages around the net, even though they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Below are some webpages really worth checking out[…]

  7. destiny boosting service

    […]one of our visitors recently advised the following website[…]

  8. vibrating dildo

    […]The details talked about in the report are a number of the most beneficial offered […]

  9. lace strap on

    […]Sites of interest we have a link to[…]

  10. best adam and eve vibrators

    […]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine some unrelated information, nonetheless really really worth taking a search, whoa did one understand about Mid East has got much more problerms as well […]

  11. thrusting rabbit

    […]that could be the end of this post. Right here you’ll find some internet sites that we believe you will appreciate, just click the links over[…]

  12. best rabbit vibrator review

    […]here are some links to web pages that we link to simply because we think they are worth visiting[…]

  13. dildo

    […]we like to honor a lot of other web sites around the web, even when they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Beneath are some webpages really worth checking out[…]

  14. sex pillow

    […]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a number of unrelated information, nevertheless genuinely worth taking a appear, whoa did 1 master about Mid East has got more problerms as well […]

  15. adam and eve triple play penis pump

    […]here are some links to websites that we link to because we assume they’re really worth visiting[…]

  16. friday i’m in love перевод

    […]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

  17. bullet vibrator

    […]here are some links to web-sites that we link to because we consider they may be worth visiting[…]

  18. unix linux system administrator jobs

    […]here are some links to websites that we link to for the reason that we assume they may be worth visiting[…]

  19. medicated diaper cream

    […]always a massive fan of linking to bloggers that I adore but do not get a whole lot of link enjoy from[…]

  20. billige fotballdrakter

    \n \n maglie calcio poco prezzo \n \n \n \n \n billige fotballdrakter \n \n \n \n \n maglie calcio bambino \n \n \n

  21. when time does the store open

    […]although sites we backlink to below are considerably not associated to ours, we feel they may be in fact worth a go by means of, so have a look[…]

  22. fotbollströjor

    niwek4u85 mnwecu9 maglie calcio bambino tixzqrj g0yksvx\n h2bd5zuest o30ezxshg maglie calcio poco prezzo khumacw6 z72rhtb3q\n uc9bj8h0gx x16wo347 billige fotballdrakter 3xzcw7ir etygjo\n

  23. buy instagram followers

    […]here are some links to sites that we link to since we feel they may be worth visiting[…]

  24. Relationship Rewrite Method

    […]here are some links to web sites that we link to for the reason that we consider they’re worth visiting[…]

  25. Ghana

    […]below you’ll find the link to some web sites that we believe you must visit[…]

  26. OPEN FOREX ACCOUNT

    […]that could be the finish of this write-up. Right here you will uncover some sites that we feel you will value, just click the links over[…]

  27. 英国伦敦华人微整形

    […]Sites of interest we have a link to[…]

  28. satisfyer pro

    […]we came across a cool web page that you may delight in. Take a look for those who want[…]

  29. vibrator

    […]here are some links to websites that we link to for the reason that we assume they are worth visiting[…]

  30. g spot massagers

    […]one of our visitors just lately suggested the following website[…]

  31. Online casino Singapore

    […]just beneath, are various entirely not associated websites to ours, having said that, they’re surely really worth going over[…]

  32. تسليك المجاري

    […]check beneath, are some absolutely unrelated websites to ours, nonetheless, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

  33. singapore wedding video

    […]always a large fan of linking to bloggers that I love but do not get a great deal of link like from[…]

  34. Stratego Original Bordspel

    […]although internet sites we backlink to beneath are considerably not connected to ours, we really feel they may be really worth a go as a result of, so have a look[…]

  35. adam and eve vibrator challenge

    […]below you will uncover the link to some web pages that we believe you should visit[…]

  36. forex EA

    […]one of our visitors a short while ago recommended the following website[…]

  37. Parallel Profits

    […]usually posts some quite exciting stuff like this. If you are new to this site[…]

  38. teen xxx

    […]The facts mentioned in the report are a few of the ideal out there […]

  39. bröllopspresent

    […]usually posts some pretty interesting stuff like this. If you are new to this site[…]

  40. burberry

    […]Here are a number of the web pages we advocate for our visitors[…]

  41. gucci

    […]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

  42. Google

    Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a couple of unrelated data, nevertheless definitely worth taking a look, whoa did one particular discover about Mid East has got additional problerms as well.

Leave a Comment