The Possibility of Democracy in Fragmented Arab Societies

Two years ago, unified opposition against the Middle East’s authoritarian regimes characterized the Arab uprisings. All the slogans shared the underlying mantra, “We want change”—change of the regime, change of the economic status quo, change of the political oppression, and change of the fearful silence.

Two years later, however, unified opposition has transformed into internal fragmentation and polarization in each country, whether they have entered a period of transition—like Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya—or not. Syria’s uprisings have spiraled into civil war. Meanwhile, in Jordan and Morocco, tensions fester below the surface as some citizens are increasingly displeased with the cosmetic changes that their respective governments implemented to quell the 2011 protests. Egypt’s transition remains in the international eye while Tunisia, where the uprisings of the Arab world began in January 2011, has faded almost wholly from global public discourse. Despite their differing face time in the media, the Egyptian and Tunisian transitions are plagued with similar sectarian polarization that, for many Westerners, seemingly denote the failure of the so-called “Arab Spring” in instituting democracy throughout the Middle East. Yet, elections, constitution writing, and continued societal debate in Egypt and Tunisia underscore an evolving reality that was virtually impossible under Mubarak and Ben Ali. However, the internal sectarian polarization in both countries threatens their respective transitions to democracy insofar as it divides the nations that, only as unified fronts, were successful in overthrowing repressive dictators.

The sectarian divide has manifested differently in the last two years, being more apparent in Egypt than in Tunisia. Moderate, liberal, and secular Egyptians criticized the Muslim Brotherhood for its reluctance to join the 2011 uprisings, its alleged politicking with the widely unpopular Security Council of Armed Forces (SCAF), and its push to hold the country’s first post-Mubarak elections before rewriting its constitution. Meanwhile, Tunisians—whose country, before the uprisings of 2011, was considered one of the more liberal in the region—were hesitant to accept Ennahda’s rising leadership. Both Egyptians and Tunisians questioned the parties’ self-proclaimed modernized form of political Islam. Through passive political participation and social programs, however, the Muslim Brotherhood and Ennahda garnered the necessary support to win elections, successfully attaining control of their respective governments.

In an attempt to maintain their newly acquired power, especially after being politically oppressed for decades, both the Muslim Brotherhood and Ennahda have confirmed—and, to some extent, exacerbated—worries that premature elections would lead to another oppressive, overreaching government. The Muslim Brotherhood has demonstrated worrisome tendencies resembling those of SCAF and Mubarak. Most notable, President Morsi assumed SCAF’s unlimited, controversial authority in June 2012 and then, late last November, decreed essentially absolute power for the president. Although he rescinded the latter decree, Morsi has thus far failed to take moderate, liberal, and secular voices into account, particularly in regards to the constitution. Similarly, the Ennahda-controlled government and constitution-writing body have exhibited more conservative tendencies than those with which they campaigned during elections. The National Constituent Assembly, which was elected in 2011 to write the constitution, failed to include safeguards protecting fundamental freedoms (namely those of expression and conscience), women’s rights, and anti-discrimination. Instead, the constitution depended more heavily on shari’a than initially expected.

The Islamist framework of both parties has added a sectarian element to the national divisions, which are inherent in times of political change and transformation. Like Mubarak’s National Democratic Party and Ben Ali’s Rally for Constitutional Democracy, the Muslim Brotherhood and Ennahda have become the dominant parties struggling to maintain power while vying against moderate, liberal, and secular opponents for political legitimacy. Therefore, neither Islamist government has made substantial strides to rectify the failing economies, address the unemployment rates, or alleviate their respective country’s poverty—all of which were among the factors that fueled the 2011 Arab uprisings. These shortcomings have rendered a perceived failure of the “Arab Spring,” with Islamist and secular parties pointing the finger at each other.

The immediate secular polarization, however, does not hamper the possibility of long-term democracy in Egypt or Tunisia. In the short-term, any form of fragmentation—sectarian, political, economic, or social in nature—will surely prolong the transition from authoritarianism to democracy. The 2011 Arab uprisings created a new space for public debate and discourse in Egypt and Tunisia, thus enabling the rise of various opinions. The very existence of this outright, apparent fragmentation signifies a shift from the Mubarak and Ben Ali regimes, under which critics of the government were jailed, tortured, and/or killed—as is still occurring in Syria, Jordan, and Bahrain. In other words, this evident societal polarization highlights an increased public discourse once impossible in the Middle East. Rather, the true danger to democracy rests in the long-term continuation of such divisions, which will occur unless Islamists and secularists alike begin to work towards the changes once called for two years ago.


Anna Maria Shaker is our Middle Eastern Affairs Editor and a Middle Eastern Studies major, FCRH 2013. She may be contacted at

1,065 thoughts on “The Possibility of Democracy in Fragmented Arab Societies”

  1. Pingback: buy cialis
  2. Pingback: propecia online
  3. Pingback: buy viagra online
  4. Pingback: guillermo
  5. Pingback: casino slots
  6. Pingback: cialis to buy
  7. Pingback: viagra for sale
  8. Pingback: generic cialis
  9. Pingback: payday loans
  10. Pingback: blazere kvinder
  11. Pingback: viagra
  12. Pingback: mima silver
  13. Pingback: gorro de satin
  14. Pingback: viagra pill
  15. Pingback: spodnie popielate
  16. Pingback: cheap cialis
  17. Pingback: cover up shirts
  18. Pingback: ipad netonnet
  19. Pingback: neymar jr jordan
  20. Pingback: andis 2 speed
  21. Pingback: generic cialis
  22. Pingback: m盲nnliche schuhe
  23. Pingback: hugo boss enfants
  24. Pingback: luna e235 black
  25. Pingback: partes del sujeto
  26. Pingback: canap茅 4 places
  27. Pingback: levitra pills
  28. Pingback: akrylov媒 sprej
  29. Pingback: Real cialis online
  30. Pingback: t shirt pelle
  31. Pingback: superdry karstadt
  32. Pingback: bugatti vetement
  33. Pingback: doudou chiot
  34. Pingback: novit脿 swarovski
  35. Pingback: Buy cialis online
  36. Pingback: eram escarpin noir
  37. Pingback: zeleny svetr
  38. Pingback: guanti uomo lana
  39. Pingback: bluza do treningu
  40. Pingback: online pharmacy
  41. Pingback: rx pharmacy
  42. Pingback: gilet rose enfant
  43. Pingback: viagra
  44. Pingback: abrigo pa帽o azul
  45. Pingback: ponyva takar贸
  46. Pingback: maletin de frozen
  47. Pingback: cialis for sale
  48. Pingback: retro 6 2019
  49. Pingback: ugradbene perilice
  50. Pingback: lebron lakers tee
  51. Pingback: towcar t3 precio
  52. Pingback: guess bag green
  53. Pingback: registrace
  54. Pingback: ed meds
  55. Pingback: sildenafil
  56. Pingback: gruba bluza damska
  57. Pingback: party la gavia
  58. Pingback: terno bom e barato
  59. Pingback: buy generic cialis
  60. Pingback: herkkujen herkku
  61. Pingback: speles games
  62. Pingback: borse 2016 2017
  63. Pingback: drammeglass i tre
  64. Pingback: pierwsze okulary
  65. Pingback: comprar ropa
  66. Pingback: chiruca ni帽o
  67. Pingback: 拧kolsk茅 mlieko
  68. Pingback: retro fives
  69. Pingback: bas adidas noir
  70. Pingback: cascola extra 14kg
  71. Pingback: lovas铆j谩sz dvd
  72. Pingback: tk maxx koce
  73. Pingback: flats wireless jvc
  74. Pingback: viagra otc
  75. Pingback: short jean ado
  76. Pingback: simbolo di nascita
  77. Pingback: mascarillas foreo
  78. Pingback: pousseur bubble go
  79. Pingback: hladilnik gorenje
  80. Pingback: lustry do pokoje
  81. Pingback: rucksack segeltuch
  82. Pingback: armani tenisice
  83. Pingback: flyknit 270 womens
  84. Pingback: kjoler 50 tallet
  85. Pingback: dressing up tables
  86. Pingback: sommer parka damen
  87. Pingback: cordon marron
  88. Pingback: r vestes en jean
  89. Pingback: tury krkonose
  90. Pingback: boty k 拧at暖m
  91. Pingback: new adidas takkies
  92. Pingback: obag cerna
  93. Pingback: boxfresh milford
  94. Pingback: 2020 royal bb4500
  95. Pingback: tacones azules
  96. Pingback: dorada slacks
  97. Pingback: jumpsuit cotone
  98. Pingback: nike jordan sconti
  99. Pingback: air 720 mujer
  100. Pingback: ua biofit 2 glove
  101. Pingback: piumone trapuntato
  102. Pingback: leopard strik jurk
  103. Pingback: 9317 adidas
  104. Pingback: nike odyssey dame
  105. Pingback: umiar kolczyki
  106. Pingback: entreprise visa
  107. Pingback: vw key badge
  108. Pingback: achat bague argent
  109. Pingback: utem酶bler daybed
  110. Pingback: laptop bag trolley
  111. Pingback: sacou barbati crem
  112. Pingback: jupon long femme
  113. Pingback: iphone 7 pink
  114. Pingback: h酶rskjorte herre
  115. Pingback: kd shoe amazon
  116. Pingback: Yeezys
  117. Pingback: Jordan 11 Concord
  118. Pingback: React Element 87
  119. Pingback: NFL Jerseys
  120. Pingback: Yeezy
  121. Pingback: Yeezy 350
  122. Pingback: Yeezy
  123. Pingback: Pandora Jewelry
  124. Pingback: Yeezy Boost 700
  125. Pingback: Nike Outlet store
  126. Pingback: Nike Outlet Online
  127. Pingback: Yeezy
  128. Pingback: Yeezy Boost 350 V2
  129. Pingback: Nike Outlet
  130. Pingback: Yeezys
  131. Pingback: Air Max 270
  132. Pingback: Balenciaga
  133. Pingback: Nike Pegasus 35
  134. Pingback: Adidas Yeezys
  135. Pingback: Nike Air Max 270

Leave a Reply