Show Your Papers: The New Voting Rules Congress is Fighting Over

Image via Southern Poverty Law Center

***

Depending on who you ask, the SAVE (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility) Act is either a safeguard or a solution in search of a problem. Introduced by Republican Representative Chip Roy in January 2025, the legislation reached the Senate on April 10th, 2025, but has since received major public criticism that has prevented it from passing. In broad terms, the proposed act would require documentary proof of United States citizenship to vote in federal elections, sparking protests across the country. After stalling in 2025, the legislation was amended to address more extreme conditions than the previous version and was passed by the House of Representatives as the SAVE America Act on February 10th, 2026 for reconsideration by the Senate, creating ongoing discourse about the bill’s future.

The SAVE Act would prohibit states from accepting voter registration without an in-person presentation of an American birth certificate or passport, and would bar voters who cannot present a photo-ID card with a visible expiration date, such as a driver’s license, from casting their vote. These requirements have raised concerns over the ability of married women and transgender people to easily register their vote: without documents that reflect their current name status, these groups would be barred from the voting process. Despite assurances from Republican Senator Mike Lee that there is “special accommodation” for those who can’t produce documentation, like sworn statements of citizenship, the act would complicate the ease and accessibility of the election ballot. Furthermore, the legislation aims to create a federal voter surveillance system, requiring states to turn over their voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security to be run through an algorithm proposed by Elon Musk that would weed out noncitizens. The bill does not require voters purged from their state rolls to be notified, meaning voters could arrive at polling sites and find their registration status no longer exists.

Critics have emphasized that the legislation is not just a mere attempt to federalize voter ID standards, but instead an attempt by President Trump to sway the 2026 Midterm elections. The recent Republican push for stricter voter requirements seems unaligned with previous party efforts and aimed at limiting voters rather than improving ballot security. In 2021, all congressional Democrats voted for a similar nationwide voter ID bill that modeled many existing state laws, while not a single Republican supported it. The act would also force millions of people to travel in order to prove their citizenship, burdening vulnerable American communities, like the elderly who rely on mail-in ballots or the socioeconomically disadvantaged who don’t have access to the correct papers, causing critics to connect the legislation’s motivation to ulterior motives. In addition to a renewed Republican enthusiasm for voter ID standards, opponents of the bill also point to Trump’s recent attempts to influence the upcoming election in his favor as an explanation for the bill. Starting in June 2025, Trump has carried out a series of invasive maneuvers into state operations to garner support for the upcoming presidential campaign. He has directed Texas to gerrymander five additional Republican-controlled congressional seats, ordered his FBI to raid election offices in Georgia for voting machines, and attempted to compel Minnesota to release its registered voter data by offering to halt ICE raids statewide, among other measures that have been called out as attempts to ensure his win.

The Republican push to pass the bill would require Democratic support to meet the two-thirds majority rule for all legislation, but the possibility of cooperation from the other side is decreasing as representatives across the aisle are growing increasingly frustrated with the stalling. While some Republican senators have advocated for changing the traditional filibuster rules of delaying legislation on the floor and boycotting all legislation until the SAVE Act is passed, their party counterparts have become outspoken in pointing out flaws in the proposed bill. Senators Lisa Murkowski and Mitch McConnell, Republicans from Alaska and Kentucky respectively, have been leading efforts in opposition and briefing the public on the potential risks, while Senate Majority Leader John Thune has taken criticism from the president and his party for remaining adamant that a “talking” filibuster would be pointless, as Republicans don’t have the numbers to pass it. Even as President Trump continues to withhold his endorsement from those who haven’t strongly advocated for the bill, many congressional members continue to protest the bill’s provisions.

In the end, the SAVE Act would do more harm than good in its goal of ensuring only legal citizens participate in future elections: the new voter requirements would eliminate voting and registration methods that 94% of Americans use, including a higher percentage of Republican voters than any other party. While President Trump has identified the legislation as his “number one” priority and opined that Republicans would not lose another election in the next 50 years if passed, the legislation would undeniably disadvantage and isolate millions of everyday Americans. The outcome of the SAVE Act will significantly influence the integrity and accessibility of the democratic process moving forward, making the ongoing Senate debate more important than ever.

***

This article was edited by Emma Saliasi.