Anti-Terrorism or Cultural Genocide?

Photo via Brittanica

***

Many reports by governments and global organizations have caused an increase in international attention surrounding concerns over human rights abuses in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China. Recent Chinese policy around terrorism has been put into question after accusations that the government is negatively targeting ethnic minority groups. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has investigated this issue in the region and has released an official assessment on the human rights violations by the People’s Republic of China. While their government claims that its actions are necessary to protect national security, the international community thinks these policies restrict the cultural identity and basic freedoms of its citizens. 

The Xinjiang Region is an area in western China and contains a predominantly Muslim ethnic minority group called the Uyghurs and other minority populations that have been there for hundreds of years. Historically, there have been tensions between these groups and the Chinese government, which has led to the government expressing concerns about terrorism and separatism in the region. Because of these claims, a series of policies has been implemented to increase control and stability within the region. 

China’s justification for these actions is that they are part of its effort to combat terrorism and extremism. After the country’s “Strike Hard” campaign, the government introduced laws such as the Counterterrorism Law and “de-extremification” regulations in Xinjiang. Under these laws, the promotion of “extremist” ideas, the possession of certain religious materials, and even outward expressions of faith like having “irregular” beards were considered illegal. Other actions, like refusing state media, discouraging participation in public activities, and teaching religious beliefs to children, are also now under the category of extremism. The OHCHR report highlights the broad definitions of terrorism and extremism being used by the Chinese government to show that even ordinary cultural or religious practices are now being interpreted as extremist behavior. This means that the policies meant to maintain security are now allowing discriminatory enforcement in the region. 

China has also implemented the use of detention facilities, referred to as “Vocational Education and Training Centers”, which government officials claim are centers to provide education and job training in order to counter extremist ideology. However, contrary to this narrative, many individuals have reportedly been detained without formal charges or trials, for reasons as little as traveling abroad or practicing their religion. Past detainees have reported being strictly disciplined by political indoctrination, restricted movement, and constant surveillance. Additionally, these individuals are being held for indefinite periods of time, while their families are given little to no information about their whereabouts. The OHCHR has also documented allegations of abuse, such as “torture and other ill-treatment.” There have also been reports that some detainees were transferred to forced labor programs once they were released. All of these reports suggest that these facilities are not just focused on education, but that they are being used as a way to control and reshape the behavior of minority populations nonconsensually. 

The cultural identity of these populations is also being suppressed as restrictions on religious practices, the use of other languages, and increased surveillance of the Uyghurs and other minority groups have increased. This reportedly has caused families to be separated and face intense pressure to conform to norms approved by the Chinese state. On top of this, a law promoting “ethnic unity” was recently passed and has made this situation all the more alarming. The goal of this law is to integrate ethnic groups in China by requiring Mandarin to be used from early childhood through high school, and limiting minority languages in education. It also allows the penalization of individuals or even parents to teach ideas or practices that are seen as opposing national unity. This law aims to encourage the assimilation of minority groups into the dominant Han Chinese culture in the name of solidarity, but it only further limits the ability of minority populations to preserve their culture and diminishes the diversity within the Xinjiang region. 

China is a part of several international human rights agreements, such as the Convention Against Torture, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, which all require participatory governments to protect individuals against arbitrary detention, discrimination based on religion or ethnicity, and inhumane treatment. The United Nations has also established international standards for counterterrorism measures, stating that they must be proportionate, clearly defined, and non-discriminatory. While governments do have the right to address its own security concerns within the country, these actions must still respect the basic human rights of its citizens. The reports and findings presented by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights suggest that the standards that China is held to are not being upheld and that the human rights of minority populations in Xinjiang are being infringed upon in the name of national security. 

***

This article was edited by Ananda Ramdass.