Image via the Brennan Center for Justice.
***
In the rapidly evolving digital age, where information flows freely and technology transforms societal norms, political institutions face increasing pressure to adapt. Among the most urgent areas of concern is electoral reform. Despite advancements in technology, many democracies continue to rely on outdated electoral systems that are vulnerable to manipulation, disenfranchisement, and polarization.
The flaws in existing electoral systems undermine the democratic principle of one person, one vote.
In the United States, the Electoral College has allowed candidates to win the presidency without securing the popular vote, as seen in 2000 and 2016. This discrepancy between the popular vote and the electoral outcome damages the legitimacy of the democratic process and contributes to voter disillusionment. For instance, in 2016, Hillary Clinton, who won the popular vote by nearly three million votes was not elected president, a result that has only deepened political polarization. Such outcomes highlight the disconnect between the will of the majority and the mechanisms that determine political leadership, raising critical questions about the fairness and representation inherent in the current system.
Furthermore, the issue extends beyond the United States. The first-past-the-post (FPTP) voting system, prevalent in countries like the United Kingdom and Canada, exacerbates political inequality. This system often results in disproportionate representation and fosters a two-party duopoly, marginalizing smaller political parties and the diversity of political opinion they represent. For example, in the 2015 UK general election, the Conservative Party secured 51% of the seats with only 37% of the vote, while the UK Independence Party, which garnered 12.6% of the vote, won just one seat. This outcome illustrates how FPTP distorts voter representation and reinforces the dominance of major parties. The lack of proportionality in FPTP systems leads to a significant portion of the electorate feeling disenfranchised, as their votes do not translate into equivalent political representation.
Beyond structural flaws, modern electoral systems are increasingly threatened by digital misinformation and foreign interference.
Social media platforms have become breeding grounds for fake news and propaganda, which deepen ideological divides and distort public perception. The 2016 U.S. presidential election highlighted how digital platforms could be exploited to influence electoral outcomes, with foreign actors leveraging these tools to sow discord and manipulate voter behavior. The Russian interference in this election, documented in the Mueller Report, underscores the vulnerability of electoral systems to external manipulation. This kind of interference not only undermines the sovereignty of democratic nations, but also erodes public trust in the democratic process. The proliferation of digital misinformation, coupled with the ease of access to these platforms, has created an environment where voters are increasingly susceptible to manipulation, thereby weakening the foundations of democracy.
The impact of misinformation is not confined to the United States. Across the globe, democracies are grappling with the challenge of maintaining electoral integrity in the face of rapidly evolving digital threats. In Europe, for example, the rise of far-right populism has been fueled in part by online misinformation campaigns, often supported by foreign entities seeking to destabilize the political order. These campaigns exploit existing social and political divisions, amplifying extremist views and undermining the cohesion of democratic societies. The challenge for electoral systems is not only to adapt to these new threats but also to find ways to mitigate their impact and restore public confidence in the democratic process.
To counter these challenges, electoral reform should prioritize the adoption of more inclusive and representative voting systems, such as ranked-choice voting (RCV). Unlike FPTP, RCV allows voters to rank candidates by preference, ensuring that the elected candidate has broader support among the electorate. The use of RCV in the 2021 New York City mayoral election demonstrated its potential to enhance voter representation and reduce negative campaigning, as candidates sought to appeal to a wider audience beyond their core base. RCV offers a promising solution to the issues of voter disenfranchisement and polarization inherent in traditional voting systems. By allowing voters to express their preferences more fully, RCV can lead to outcomes that more accurately reflect the will of the majority, thereby increasing the legitimacy of elected officials.
Moreover, RCV encourages a more positive and issue-focused political discourse. In an RCV system, candidates are incentivized to appeal to a broader range of voters, including those who may rank them as a second or third choice. It can reduce the prevalence of negative campaigning, as candidates seek to avoid alienating potential supporters of their opponents. Additionally, RCV has been shown to increase voter turnout by making elections more competitive and engaging for a broader segment of the population. As democracies face increasing challenges from within and without, adopting RCV represents a crucial step toward creating more resilient and representative electoral systems.
In addition to reforming voting systems, securing the digital infrastructure of elections is critical. Governments should invest in robust cybersecurity measures to protect electoral systems from hacking, manipulation, and foreign interference. This includes enhancing encryption protocols, conducting regular audits of voting machines, and collaborating with technology companies to combat disinformation campaigns. Estonia’s highly secure internet voting system, which incorporates rigorous identity verification and regular audits, serves as a model for how digital democracy can be safeguarded. Strengthening cybersecurity is essential to preserving the integrity of the electoral process and ensuring that the democratic will of the people is accurately reflected.
The importance of cybersecurity cannot be overstated in an era where digital threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated. The potential for cyberattacks to disrupt elections and alter outcomes poses a significant risk to the stability of democratic institutions. For example, in 2020, there were numerous reports of attempts to hack into voting systems and spread misinformation to influence voter behavior in the U.S. elections. While these attempts were largely unsuccessful, they highlight the ongoing vulnerability of electoral systems to cyber threats. To mitigate these risks, governments should prioritize cybersecurity as a critical component of electoral reform. This includes not only protecting the physical infrastructure of voting systems, but also addressing the broader digital ecosystem in which elections take place.
Finally, efforts to promote civic education and media literacy are vital to combating misinformation and fostering an informed electorate. Citizens should be equipped with the critical thinking skills necessary to discern fact from fiction and engage in civil discourse. Education campaigns should emphasize the importance of verifying sources and challenging misleading information. Finland’s education system, which integrates media literacy into the curriculum, offers a successful example of how societies can be made more resilient to misinformation. By investing in civic education, democracies can build a well-informed citizenry that is less susceptible to manipulation and more engaged in the democratic process.
In addition to formal education, media literacy programs should be expanded to reach a broader audience, including older generations who may be more susceptible to misinformation.
Public awareness campaigns that promote critical thinking and encourage citizens to seek out reliable sources of information are essential for building a more informed and engaged electorate. As misinformation becomes an increasingly pervasive threat to democratic processes, the need for comprehensive media literacy education has never been greater. By fostering a more discerning public, democracies can reduce the impact of misinformation and ensure that voters are making informed decisions based on accurate information.
Electoral reform should also address systemic barriers to political participation, such as voter suppression tactics and gerrymandering, which disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Voter ID laws and other suppression measures undermine the principle of equal representation. Expanding access to the ballot through automatic voter registration, early voting options, and measures to combat voter intimidation is essential for ensuring that all eligible citizens can participate in the democratic process. The success of automatic voter registration in states like Oregon, which saw increased voter turnout, demonstrates the potential of these reforms. Additionally, establishing independent redistricting commissions is crucial to combating gerrymandering and ensuring fair representation.
Voter suppression not only disenfranchises specific segments of the population, but also undermines the legitimacy of the democratic process. When citizens are systematically excluded from participating in elections, the resulting government lacks true representative legitimacy. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach that includes legal reforms, public awareness campaigns, and continued vigilance against efforts to suppress the vote. Ensuring that every eligible citizen can vote is fundamental to maintaining a healthy democracy.
Electoral reform is essential for revitalizing democracy in the digital age. By adopting more inclusive voting systems like ranked-choice voting, bolstering cybersecurity measures, promoting civic education, and combating voter suppression, democracies can safeguard the integrity of elections and ensure that every voice is heard. In an era of rapid technological change, the future of democracy depends on the ability to adapt and strengthen electoral systems to meet the challenges of the 21st century. By addressing these critical issues can democratic institutions remain resilient and responsive to the needs of the people they serve.
***
This article was edited by Graham Thoresen and Bowen Yao.
