Student Loan Forgiveness: Relief or Economic Burden?

Image via Getty Images

***

In today’s competitive job environment, higher education is no longer an advantage; it is a requirement. Nearly 66% of Americans have some form of college education, and 43 million of those individuals have taken out student loans to finance their education. Estimates indicate that individuals with college degrees will earn $1.2 million more than those with only a high school diploma over the course of their lives, making a college education almost necessary for long-term financial stability. However, this discrepancy not only reflects the rise in job and educational requirements but also indicates the growing cost of funding higher education. Currently, the total student loan debt in the United States exceeds $1.7 trillion, matching the country’s annual budget deficit. 

In 2023, the Biden-Harris administration launched the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, providing income-driven repayment (IDR) plans to 7 million eligible Americans, allowing for lower monthly payments and interest protection as a step toward loan forgiveness. The SAVE plan also aimed to forgive a significant portion of loans for families with incomes up to $250,000, catering to a range of socioeconomic groups. However, the plan faced legal challenges over its bypass of legislative approval, implementation issues, and disruptions to other IDR plan application processes. SAVE was challenged by many states, leading to a halt in the plan’s implementation and forcing borrowers into administrative forbearance. The plan was eventually disbanded in 2025 with the Trump administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, preserving statutory requirements and fiscal conservatism.

The legal and political debates surrounding the SAVE plan have also raised broader questions about who truly benefits from large-scale student loan relief policies. While the program’s original design was  to reduce repayment burdens across income groups, further examination of the income distribution of borrowers and debt payments suggests that the benefits of these policies may not be targeting the groups most in need.

Three-quarters of federal student loan repayments are made by the top 40% of earners in the country, suggesting that the burden of debt repayment may not be primarily affecting the socioeconomic groups we believe it does. Among those seeking higher education, individuals from low-income families are more likely to receive government or institutional need-based aid. At the same time, students from higher-income backgrounds are more likely to borrow from the federal government and private lenders to fund their education. As a large portion of debt is held and repaid by higher-income borrowers, broad forgiveness policies may distribute costs in ways that have a negative overall economic impact.

Student loan forgiveness may harm the overall economy more than it will benefit the few it forgives. The debt repayments forgiven by these programs do not simply disappear; they are redistributed. Forgiving student loan debt, which is federal money provided by taxpayer dollars, forces the government to absorb the cost of the loans, while taxpayers indirectly bear the costs through increased government borrowing or reduced funding for other programs. 

Additionally, forgiveness serves as a poor economic stimulus; forgiving the outstanding $1.7 trillion in debt increases U.S. cash flow by only $90 billion while simultaneously widening the budget deficit. As high-income individuals hold most student loan debt, forgiveness plans would return money to those who are well-off, likely delaying spending and the time that the money circulates within the economy. If the government offsets loan forgiveness programs by increasing debt, future tax increases or higher interest payments will reduce the overall economic benefit.

These programs ignore the true underlying issue: the price inflation of a college education.  Over the past 20 years, college tuition rates have doubled, with private university tuition exceeding median household income by nearly 150%. These tuition rate increases show no signs of slowing, and as a result, student debt in the U.S. will continue to increase. The inability to pay off tens of thousands in loans stems from the rapidly rising interest rates colleges are charging. 

While student loan forgiveness programs are often framed as a solution to the increasing burden of obtaining a higher education, they fail to address the structural issues driving this crisis. Forgiveness efforts redistribute costs to taxpayers, risk widening the federal tax deficit, and may disproportionately benefit high-income borrowers who hold the majority share of outstanding student loan debt. Most importantly, these policies do nothing to address the rapid rise in tuition that fuels the need for student loans. Without addressing the underlying rising costs of higher education, student debt will continue to accumulate regardless of temporary relief programs. Sustainable solutions must focus not only on reducing repayments but also on reducing the cost of obtaining a college education.

***

This article was edited by Lauren Fattorusso.