Unfeigned Fetterman: A Blueprint for Populist Progressivism

Photo via the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

***

The Democratic Party is adrift, rudderless, and without identity in 2025. Following an embarrassing showing last election day, one in which Donald Trump rode the waves of populism to a second term, the only thing Democrats seem to agree on is the need for the party’s reinvention. Yet, as Donald Trump rapidly implements his agenda through sweeping executive orders, Democrats remain paralyzed by internal divisions, unable to coalesce around a clear strategy to counter his policies or articulate a unifying vision for the future. Whether it be Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts’ blind opposition to nearly anything done by Trump or Chris Murphy of Connecticut’s daily self-righteous MSNBC interviews, it has become increasingly clear a new strategy must be forged. 

Enter John Fetterman. Through his working-class appeal and honest, down-to-earth rhetoric, the Pennsylvania senator has emerged as an unlikely voice of reason amid Democratic disillusionment during the second Trump presidency. Fetterman seamlessly crosses the line between progressive populism and blue-collar practicality, offering Democrats something they urgently lack: authenticity. While elitist politicians squabble about ideological purity and media strategy, Fetterman is out in the trenches—campaigning in red districts, fighting Republicans on economic fairness, yet refusing to join in the theatrical indignation that has characterized modern politics. With his distinctive hoodies and outspoken approach, he strikingly contrasts the polished, consultant-driven narrative that has alienated much of the Democratic base. 

Unlike many in his party who see Trump’s second term as an existential crisis, Fetterman has taken a different approach: a willingness to work with the president where interests align while forcefully opposing him where they do not. Many Democrats refuse to engage with the administration on principle. Fetterman has clarified that his priority is delivering for working people—even if that means finding common ground with Trump. “I’m in the business of finding wins for Pennsylvania and the nation,” Fetterman recently remarked. This pragmatic, result-oriented philosophy is precisely what the Democratic Party needs: a break from the paralysis of ideological purity and performative resistance that has weakened their position.

Fetterman’s willingness to collaborate with others when necessary does not suggest that his values will be compromised. Instead, it promotes a populist progressive agenda rooted in realistic, achievable goals. For example, Fetterman backed President Trump’s infrastructure plans because he recognized an opportunity to fix the nation’s crumbling infrastructure and create jobs for working people. This illustrates Fetterman’s capacity to sidestep the pitfalls of symbolic politics, which can alienate voters seeking practical solutions by focusing on issues that matter most to local residents, such as healthcare, labor rights, and economic opportunity. Many Americans, weary of establishment politics, are drawn to leaders who can achieve their goals, even if it means breaking from party norms, and they connect with his message.

Fetterman’s strategy provides the Democratic Party with a road map for self-discovery. He shows that progressivism may flourish when it is based on workable ideas that tackle the actual problems faced by actual Americans instead of adhering to ideological purity. His populist program centers on infrastructure, healthcare, and economic opportunity—areas where working with political rivals like Trump may have a significant impact. Fetterman demonstrates that leadership is more than resistance by prioritizing action over words. Working across party lines for the greater good takes guts. The Democratic Party has to adopt this genuine, results-oriented perspective to recover its footing and successfully combat Trump’s populist appeal. Fetterman’s brand of populist progressivism is not just a strategy; it’s the party’s future—one that seeks to unite rather than divide, with an unwavering commitment to improving the lives of everyday Americans.

***

This article was edited by Naba Syed.