Photo by Ricardo Arduengo via Getty Images
***
In the wake of recent hurricanes and natural disasters, a troubling trend has emerged in the U.S.—harmful rhetoric and conspiracy theories that blur the lines between facts and outright denial of the threats posed by these events. These theories are often spread on social media platforms such as X (formerly known as Twitter), where misinformation can quickly go viral. It distracts from the real issues: the immediate need for government action and effective disaster management regarding climate change. Claims that hurricanes are “geo-engineered” by the government to worsen storms for political gain are just one such example. Many political and social media figures, such as Matt Wallace, have amplified unfounded claims.
This conspiracy-laden rhetoric has real consequences. It shows distrust in meteorological data and diminishes the public’s sense of urgency. When people doubt the authenticity of a storm forecast or believe that evacuation warnings are politically motivated, protecting lives and mitigating damage becomes harder. Some 35% of Americans believe that the media exaggerates the threat of climate change, while roughly 42% of adults say it does not take the threat seriously enough.
While rhetoric clouds public perception, the failure of government action in some areas is even more damaging. Take Florida, a state perpetually at risk during hurricane season. During Hurricane Katrina in 2005, for example, the government was unprepared. Even though it was widely known that such a hurricane was probable, the government needed more clarity in the deployment of supplies, medical personnel decisions, and more. The U.S. government, both at the federal and state levels, can assist in evacuations, provide financial support, and implement systems for early warning. However, the storm’s damage was greatly exacerbated by the failures of Congress, the Bush administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Army Corps of Engineers. FEMA turned away doctors volunteering their services and refused Amtrak’s offer to evacuate victims. There are even more cases where the response has been inadequate, or even negligent, leaving vulnerable communities without proper evacuation resources.
The situation in Florida illustrates the need for more equitable and comprehensive evacuation plans. Low-income households face challenges in receiving emergency alerts, getting evacuation guidance and transport, acquiring shelter, and receiving appropriate nutrition, medical care, childcare, and educational support. Many residents, particularly low-income families and those without access to transportation, cannot leave when disaster strikes. However, instead of prioritizing these communities, government response efforts often favor wealthier, more accessible areas, essentially turning a blind eye to those most at risk. Evacuation routes are only sometimes well-maintained, shelters may be underfunded, and emergency communications can be inconsistent, leading to dangerous situations where residents remain trapped in the storm’s path.
Although programs like FEMA, which are designed to offer support, exist, many lower-income families still need to qualify for disaster loans. Therefore, the FEMA individual grants need to be increased to fund rebuilding. The disconnect between state and federal governments in disaster response, alongside inconsistent funding, means that many people are left to fend for themselves. This negligence perpetuates cycles of poverty and disaster vulnerability, as those who survive natural disasters are often left with little support to rebuild their lives.
So, what can be done? For one, the government can ensure that evacuation efforts are more inclusive, and there also needs to be greater collaboration between federal, state, and local governments in preparing for disasters. Pre-disaster investments—such as building flood defenses, upgrading infrastructure, and improving communication systems—can reduce the severity of the impact when hurricanes do hit. These actions save money in the long run and, more importantly, save lives. There also needs to be an initiative that provides transportation options for those without vehicles, investing in infrastructure for quick mass evacuations, and ensuring that shelters are adequately supplied and distributed across communities. In the aftermath of the disaster, the federal government can expand disaster relief funds and expedite their distribution to those affected.
Moreover, the damage done to America’s global image is significant. As the country struggles to adequately address the growing frequency and intensity of natural disasters, it sends a message to the rest of the world that the U.S. needs to prepare to protect its citizens. Climate change will only continue to exacerbate these events. These natural disasters are an urgent human crisis where the government must focus on addressing the needs of its citizens to ensure that everyone can access safety and resources when disaster strikes. It is time for a serious, coordinated effort to stop the harmful rhetoric and provide accurate, meaningful solutions to protect Americans from future catastrophes.
***
This article was edited by Margeaux Wenner and Victoria Zhang.
