It Could Happen To You, Too

Photo via CNN

***

On February 26th, 2026, Kansas State Senate Bill 244 was enacted into law. This law marks a momentous change in the degree of control state governments can exert over residents of their state. However, for the vast majority of people living in this country, the day most likely passed uneventfully. In fact, this law only directly affected 1,700 individuals immediately upon being enacted. But, as a legal precedent, it stands to threaten the rights of every person who has a government-issued ID or uses public restrooms. As mandated by this law, the state of Kansas has retroactively invalidated approximately 1,700 drivers’ licenses and roughly as many birth certificates held by transgender individuals, due to having updated gender markers that reflect their self-identified gender rather than their assigned gender at birth. 

These official identifying documents are not invalid after a certain date; they immediately became invalid forms of legal identification on February 26th, 2026. Other states, including Florida, Tennessee, and Texas, don’t allow driver’s licenses that reflect a trans person’s self-identified gender, but Kansas is the first and only state to have retroactively invalidated the IDs of all trans people who previously opted for gender markers that reflect their gender identity. The Kansas government provided no grace period, notifying trans people affected by the bill by mail just 3 days before the law took effect, allowing no opportunity to update their licenses before they were rendered invalid.

The arguments levied by the proponents of this law are familiar ones. Republicans lawmakers argue laws like these are necessary to protect women from transgender women, whom they incorrectly refer to as men. They argue these policies work against radical “gender ideology,” returning to the “common sense” notion that biological sex and gender identity are identical and immutable. These arguments, however, disguise the broader impacts such a law has on the rights of all United States residents. This decision should concern everyone who has a government-issued ID or happens to use a public restroom, even those who disagree with how transgender people self-identify.

The ability to arbitrarily invalidate the official identification of a certain class of people is a dangerous power to leave unchecked. Transgender people could face up to six months in jail and a $1000 fine for using a now-invalidated driver’s license that reflects their self-identified gender. Furthermore, the law establishes civil penalties under which citizens can sue transgender people they encounter in restrooms for up to $1000. 

This unequivocally puts transgender people in danger. Under similar laws, transgender individuals using the legally mandated bathroom have been harassed and detained because their gender expression does not match their assigned sex at birth. Forcing people who identify as men to use women’s bathrooms and people who identify as women to use men’s bathrooms causes confusion and puts people in danger. Allowing people to use the bathroom that aligns with their self-identified gender is the safest option for everyone. 

The danger does not end there. The passage of such a law establishes a precedent. If this law stands, state governments could unilaterally disqualify the official identification of others as well. Such a precedent takes away everyone’s right to self-identify and to maintain control of their self-expression, even if they are not transgender. Cisgender men and women who do not identifiably present as their assigned gender at birth could also face harassment. Such a law presumes that the government has the right to know what’s in your pants and penalize you if it does not match the way you present and identify yourself. 

All citizens have a right to privacy, as established by Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), putting a limit on how far the government can reach into their private lives without due process. Giving the government the power to force people to use particular bathrooms or other gendered facilities on the basis of their assigned sex at birth puts everyone’s right to privacy at risk. It empowers people to demand ‘proof’ that your assigned sex at birth conforms to your gender presentation. It establishes that the government has a right to invade your privacy, without due process. If this law stands, everyone’s right to privacy is now on more precarious legal ground. More likely than not, you’re not a transgender person living in Kansas. But this law still affects you; the erosion of anyone’s rights is the erosion of everyone’s rights.

***

This article was edited by Emily Caro and Cristina Palmieri.